On 12 Aug 2010, at 15:48, Rich Tibbett wrote: > Robin just pointed out that noon ET would be *extremely* inconvenient for > folks from Korea (at least one of whom will be part of the conversation). > > So let's decouple this: If you're interested in the conversation, please > speak up now. > > Once we have a firm list of participants, we'll need to go through the > scheduling exercise. > > Would it make sense to have two calls here? One on the DAP stuff and one on lunisolar calendars? Actually I think the group of folks potentially interested in each of those on the CalConnect side may not be the same so separate calls may work better (and may be scheduled more appropriately based on participant timezones). > > > Right. I second that opinion. I believe there are two distinct issues here: calendar formats and lunisolar support. I think a split could make for more focussed discussions. > > I will attend this meeting (or both meetings if we decide to separate the discussion items). Same here; and +1 to Cyrus as well.
Received on Thursday, 12 August 2010 13:52:09 UTC