W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis@w3.org > August 2010

Scheduling calendaring coordination call.

From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 19:38:52 +0200
Cc: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>, W3C Device APIs and Policy WG <public-device-apis@w3.org>
Message-Id: <83A4F08D-156D-466E-81DC-46643AACD873@w3.org>
To: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
hi Cyrus,

let's see where the two calls approach takes us.

For the lunisolar discussion, my sense is that the interested parties on the DAP side are Robin, Rich Tibbett, Dom or myself, possibly Suresh, certainly Wonsuk Lee and Donyoung Lee.  That means that we'll have a bunch of folks in Europe, Korea, and one person on Eastern Time for that call.

For general coordination, I'd expect Robin, Rich, Dom or myself to be the relevant parties; all on EU time.

Want to take a stab at proposing time slots?

(All: If I'm getting the list of interest parties wrong for any of these calls, please correct now!)

Thomas Roessler, W3C  <tlr@w3.org>  (@roessler)

On 12 Aug 2010, at 15:37, Cyrus Daboo wrote:

> Hi Thomas,
> --On August 11, 2010 4:19:59 PM +0200 Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org> wrote:
>> Robin just pointed out that noon ET would be *extremely* inconvenient for
>> folks from Korea (at least one of whom will be part of the conversation).
>> So let's decouple this:  If you're interested in the conversation, please
>> speak up now.
>> Once we have a firm list of participants, we'll need to go through the
>> scheduling exercise.
> Would it make sense to have two calls here? One on the DAP stuff and one on lunisolar calendars? Actually I think the group of folks potentially interested in each of those on the CalConnect side may not be the same so separate calls may work better (and may be scheduled more appropriately based on participant timezones).
> -- 
> Cyrus Daboo
Received on Monday, 30 August 2010 17:38:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:32:22 UTC