- From: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:33:23 -0500
- To: ext Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, David Rogers <david.rogers@omtp.org>, Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-device-apis <public-device-apis@w3.org>
the charter says in section 3: "The working group will deliver at least the following specifications:" Thus just because an API is not listed does not mean it is automatically out of scope. The only item listed as out of scope is noted in section 2.2: "The management of security policies (e.g. by remote entities) is out of scope of this group." However the fact that certain APIs are explicitly listed suggests that they might have higher priority. regards, Frederick Frederick Hirsch Nokia On Nov 18, 2009, at 9:07 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > On Nov 13, 2009, at 10:36 , David Rogers wrote: >> Yes, I asked for a resolution at the time but the chairs said it >> wasn't necessary. > > Correct, the charter is our guide here, it is a delineation of the > permissible: we can do less than what is says but not more. > > -- > Robin Berjon > robineko — hired gun, higher standards > http://robineko.com/ > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 18 November 2009 14:34:11 UTC