- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 11:42:19 +0100
- To: arun@mozilla.com
- Cc: public-device-apis@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org
Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 02:28 -0800, Arun Ranganathan a écrit : > Discussion about renaming shows that there isn't really consensus about > a name change [1][2], so I haven't proceeded with one. I'd rather > proceed without a name change for now, but work towards evolving file > write capabilities safely for the web based on this API. I'm not averse > to multiple specifications (and better naming later on), if we find that > use cases diverge between groups. Some editorial help has been > forthcoming [3], which is welcome. It certainly seems entirely reasonable not to change the title now (i.e. before the FPWD), given indeed lack of consensus on the topic. I tend to think that it’s probably better to work separately on the read and write access (independently on the questions of which WG the work happens), since read-access seems to be closer to be ready and well-understood than writing — I guess that’s really what needs to be discussed now rather than the title of the spec which really is only a corollary issue. Dom [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0604.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0572.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0558.html
Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 10:42:40 UTC