RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities

Hi,

Yes, I asked for a resolution at the time but the chairs said it wasn't necessary.

Cheers,


David.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-device-apis-request@w3.org [mailto:public-device-apis-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Dominique Hazael-Massieux
Sent: 12 November 2009 15:26
To: Tran, Dzung D
Cc: public-device-apis
Subject: RE: DAP Roadmap, priorities

Le jeudi 12 novembre 2009 à 07:14 -0800, Tran, Dzung D a écrit :
> I don't want to rehash our previous discussion in the WG, but at one
> time we decided that for v1.0 we would stay with simple API that the
> implementers can implement in a short period of time.  We decided to
> remove all sensors related APIs till v2.0.

That’s my recollection as well, although I haven’t found a clear WG
resolution on the topic; but based on that recollection, I have added
the “generic sensor API” in the list of future work for DAP:
http://www.w3.org/2009/dap/#future


Dom

Received on Friday, 13 November 2009 09:36:46 UTC