- From: Robin Berjon <robin@robineko.com>
- Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:48:45 +0200
- To: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: "public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>
On Aug 6, 2009, at 17:34 , Dominique Hazael-Massieux wrote: > Le jeudi 06 août 2009 à 17:26 +0200, Robin Berjon a écrit : >> On Aug 6, 2009, at 13:41 , Marcin Hanclik wrote: >>> Probably we will want to verify Web IDL fragments, we may want to >>> check some semantics or dependencies between various parts of >>> various specs. >> >> That should be part of PubRules checking (so that a spec cannot be >> released without the checks), > > (not sure that belong to pubrules, but it clearly is something that > WebIDL-producing groups should ensure before requesting publication) I'd really like to see it as an option in PubRules and if possible there by default (though there's no emergency). I really like it when PubRules catches errors, so the more it can look for the better IMHO. -- Robin Berjon robineko — setting new standards http://robineko.com/
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 15:49:23 UTC