[vibration] Wide review tracker (#39)

anssiko has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/vibration:

== Wide review tracker ==
> [!NOTE]
>This is a process issue to track [wide review](https://www.w3.org/2023/Process-20231103/#wide-review) for the Vibration API.
>
>An important part of wide review is horizontal review from W3C's [key horizontal groups](https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/#how_to_get_horizontal_review) listed below in **horizontal groups** section. Also feedback from **other stakeholders** is equally important. Additional pointers are welcome via comments.
>
>Legend:
>⚪ Review request not submitted
>🟡 Review request submitted
>🔵 Review feedback received
>🟢 Review closed as completed

### Horizontal groups

⚪ ♿ **Accessibility** ([Accessible Platform Architectures Working Group](https://www.w3.org/WAI/about/groups/apawg/))
- [x] Work through the [a11y checklist](https://w3c.github.io/apa/fast/checklist.html): https://github.com/w3c/vibration/issues/37
- [ ] [Request a review](https://github.com/w3c/a11y-request/issues/new/choose)

⚪ 📐 **Architecture** ([Technical Architecture Group](https://www.w3.org/2001/tag/))
- [x] See [how to work with the TAG](https://tag.w3.org/workmode/)
- [ ] [Request a review](https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/new/choose)

⚪ 🌍 **Internationalization** ([Internationalization Working Group](https://www.w3.org/International/i18n-activity/i18n-wg/))
- [x] Read [how to request a review](https://www.w3.org/International/review-request)
- [x] Work through the [i18n checklist](https://www.w3.org/International/i18n-drafts/techniques/shortchecklist): https://github.com/w3c/vibration/issues/38
- [ ] [Request a review](https://github.com/w3c/i18n-request/issues/new/choose)

⚪ 🔍 **Privacy** ([Privacy Interest Group](https://www.w3.org/groups/ig/privacy/))
- [x] Write a "Privacy Considerations" section for your document, taking into account the [Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/), [Mitigating Browser Fingerprinting in Web Specifications](https://www.w3.org/TR/fingerprinting-guidance/), and [RFC6973](https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6973.html)
- [x] https://github.com/w3c/vibration/issues/36
- [ ] [Request a review](https://github.com/w3cping/privacy-request/issues/new/choose)

⚪ 🔒 **Security**
- [x] Write a "Security Considerations" section for your document, taking into account the [Self-Review Questionnaire: Security and Privacy](https://www.w3.org/TR/security-privacy-questionnaire/)
- [x] https://github.com/w3c/vibration/issues/36
- [ ] [Request a review](https://github.com/w3c/security-request/issues/new/choose)

### Other stakeholders

From [who to ask for review](https://www.w3.org/Guide/documentreview/#who_to_ask_for_review):
>Horizontal reviews [...] are only a subset of a full wide review, which must also include other stakeholders including Web developers, technology providers and implementers not active in the Working Group, external groups and standards organizations working on related areas, etc.

- Mozilla position: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/907
- WebKit position: https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/267

Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/vibration/issues/39 using your GitHub account


-- 
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config

Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2024 11:10:12 UTC