- From: Daniel Appelquist via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 07:37:44 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
I would like to make a case that this work should not be consigned to WICG. The work is at a [good stage of development](https://diek.us/fold-angle/) - beyond many other work items in WICG. It makes much more sense for it to be worked on in a full working group which has already accepted it into its charter. While it's definitely true that some of the work would need to happen in CSS, I think it makes much more sense for the initial work to progress in DASWG than WICG and for that collaboration to happen between CSS WG and DASWG. As a meta comment, WICG is a great place to incubate new ideas but in the TAG we are generally encouraging work to happen or to have a trajectory towards full working groups – this is something we encourage through our design review process. It's a little frustrating to see someone recommending that a spec move backwards from an already drafted WG charter to WICG, especially when many W3C member organisations have already made commitments to work in that working group. -- GitHub Notification of comment by torgo Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/dap-charter/issues/102#issuecomment-654660069 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2020 07:37:45 UTC