Re: [dap-charter] DASWG: Leave Fold Angle in WICG for now and collaborate with CSS (#102)

I would like to make a case that this work should not be consigned to WICG. The work is at a [good stage of development]( - beyond many other work items in WICG. It makes much more sense for it to be worked on in a full working group which has already accepted it into its charter. While it's definitely true that some of the work would need to happen in CSS, I think it makes much more sense for the initial work to progress in DASWG than WICG and for that collaboration to happen between CSS WG and DASWG.

As a meta comment, WICG is a great place to incubate new ideas but in the TAG we are generally encouraging work to happen or to have a trajectory towards full working groups – this is something we encourage through our design review process. It's a little frustrating to see someone recommending that a spec move backwards from an already drafted WG charter to WICG, especially when many W3C member organisations have already made commitments to work in that working group.

GitHub Notification of comment by torgo
Please view or discuss this issue at using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 7 July 2020 07:37:45 UTC