- From: Mikhail Pozdnyakov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 11:42:23 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
> If that's what you mean, then I think we're in perfect agreement. Right. cool :) > Note we might still want to channel (3) in the rAF (to avoid the critical path), but that would be for perf reasons only. yes, any (frequent) notification should be in sync with rAF whatever it contains. Thanks for the discussion! -- GitHub Notification of comment by pozdnyakov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/171#issuecomment-288053557 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 21 March 2017 11:42:29 UTC