- From: Anssi Kostiainen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:59:41 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Thanks, how about the exploration item: >The use of only two high-level sensor permission names e.g. movement and (environment) ambient. Was out exploration outcome to go with low-level sensor permission names such as `ambient-light-sensor`? With that as a precedence, I'm expecting we are now converging on: * `proximity-sensor` * `accelerometer` * `gyroscope` * `magnetometer` * `orientation-sensor` Rather than high-level sensor permission names: * `environment-sensors` * `motion-sensors` FTR, I don't have a personal opinion on which way to go, but I think we should settle on something rather sooner than later, and stick with it. As discussed in this issue, these strings are probably never a good idea to be surfaced to the UI level, rather mapped to something more sensible to the user. And that's great, and by design. -- GitHub Notification of comment by anssiko Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/22#issuecomment-285663269 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 10 March 2017 12:59:48 UTC