- From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2017 21:21:55 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
> Just be careful with extrapolating Figure 5 to all sensors - or even a particular one is misleading (as I wrote). It also applies to a particular risk scenario, and a particular description model. In no way it's generic, but the feeling might be similar in some respects - the mechanics of accuracy is improving but then gradually shifts to a place where it no longer makes much difference. Still, going for "OK so 10 Hz is fine" based on Figure 5 would be not quite proper, in general. 100% with you. The current position from implementors is that there's a cut off point at 60 Hz beyond which they're not willing to go for security reasons. Both your data and the data provided by @maryammjd above indicate that not only this cut off point is arbitrary, but its also to high to protect against threats for which we have data. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tobie Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/98#issuecomment-284073444 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 3 March 2017 21:22:02 UTC