Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state

Here are couple of proposals, feel free to play with the image src to 
come up with your preferred option.

#### Current
![](https://yuml.me/diagram/plain;scale:180/activity/(start)-construct%3E(unconnected)-start%3E(activating)-%3E(activated)-stop%3E(idle),(activating)-%3E(errored),(activated)-%3E(errored),(idle)-start%3E(activating).svg)

#### Connect all the things
![](https://yuml.me/diagram/plain;scale:180/activity/(start)-construct%3E(unconnected)-start%3E(connecting)-%3E(connected)-stop%3E(deconnected),(connecting)-%3E(errored),(connected)-%3E(errored),(deconnected)-start%3E(connecting).svg)

#### Activate all the things
![](https://yuml.me/diagram/plain;scale:180/activity/(start)-construct%3E(inactivated)-start%3E(activating)-%3E(activated)-stop%3E(deactivated),(activating)-%3E(errored),(activated)-%3E(errored),(deactivated)-start%3E(activating).svg)


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/160#issuecomment-275716147 using
 your GitHub account

Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 17:00:22 UTC