W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-device-apis-log@w3.org > January 2017

Re: [sensors] Find a better name for 'unconnected' state

From: Tobie Langel via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2017 14:11:25 +0000
To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-275673530-1485526283-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Agree "unconnected" is bad.
"undefined" as a state is weird, though. "uninitialized," I originally
 rejected, because the object has been initialized already when you 
constructed it. But I'm warming up to it.

I guess the question is whether you think of the `state` attribute as 
describing the state of the sensor instance itself or the underlying 
sensor. I don't have a good answer to that. @rwaldron, @kenchris.

GitHub Notification of comment by tobie
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/sensors/issues/160#issuecomment-275673530 using
 your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 27 January 2017 14:11:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 4 July 2022 12:47:53 UTC