- From: Alexander Shalamov via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 09:46:10 +0000
- To: public-device-apis-log@w3.org
@tobie thanks for comments. > 2. The term raw is sort of weird as the data is partially calibrated. Agree, I also feel that 'Raw' term is confusing, unfortunately don't have proposal for a better name. > 3. We'd need a term for this dynamic calibration... I think we should 'pull-up' terms as soon as there is more that 1 place where it is defined (applicable). If this is a generic term, absolutely. If it is only for magnetometer, maybe we can keep it in magnetometer spec, wdyt? > 4. As an option, we need something like keep HardIronBias or avoidHardIronCorrection This makes magnetometer interface calibrated and (almost)uncalibrated at the same time, introduces side-effects. If developer constructs magnetometer with 'avoidHardIronCorrection = true' what would happen at start()? - Throw 'NotFoundError', wrong, since magnetometer is present. - Silently fallback to Magnetometer, bad. - Throw 'CannotAvoidError' :D ? - Something else? -- GitHub Notification of comment by alexshalamov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/magnetometer/pull/21#issuecomment-292492004 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 April 2017 09:46:16 UTC