- From: Kevin Muldoon via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2023 11:04:52 +0000
- To: public-design-tokens-log@w3.org
### CIT vs. CTI @JayHalligan I'll have a fully functional CTI+ Style Dictionary demo available on GitHub before the end of the year, so everybody can give it a try. One nice thing about the CTI+ schema is the dynamics (Category, Type, Item, etc) can be ordered in any way you like (So, **color-button-font** rather than **colour-font-button**). Instead, it will be highly opinionated on the **consistency** of the dynamics order for all tokens. Where CIT feels natural for buttons, it may seem odd for other definitions, or so I've noticed. I suspect 99% of us would be happy with CIT and make that the default order. A large sample of token names and/or an interactive web app asking users 'what would you call this?'. Finally generating a fully ordered set of tokens according to simple input from the user. ### Figma Variables I had high hopes for variables but it's all the same from a Tokens Exporter/Style Dictionary POV. We can transform Styles/Variables or both. -- GitHub Notification of comment by caoimghgin Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/design-tokens/community-group/issues/220#issuecomment-1744736011 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Tuesday, 3 October 2023 11:04:53 UTC