- From: Dominik Deák via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2022 12:42:30 +0000
- To: public-design-tokens-log@w3.org
My reasoning for picking ACEScg is because it is used by high end production and rendering, and is specifically tailored for CGI effects and image compositing applications. ACEScg has a colour gamut that pretty much covers almost every other gamuts in existence. The benefit here is future support for display technologies that will exceed Display P3 capability. In fact, some OLED displays available today already do that, and the newer quantum dot OLEDs are expected to approach (or even match) Rec.2020 capability. Who knows what other marvels we’ll see 10 years down the track? I think having the foresight for supporting widest available colour spaces (either ACEScg, or at least something equivalent) will be a benefit for future content creators. It’s all about establishing plenty of headroom early on in the standard, and not having to push revisions/amendments later (which I suspect might suffer from fragmented adoption). -- GitHub Notification of comment by DominikDeak Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/design-tokens/community-group/issues/157#issuecomment-1178945831 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Friday, 8 July 2022 12:42:32 UTC