- From: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:21:13 +0100
- To: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-declarative-apps@w3.org, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
We should certainly be able to do that, Dan, yes. Complete with vary header :-) Incidentally, this reminds me that I think Martynas sent me a file to upload ages ago that I haven't acted on. I'll try and get on to that soon. Phil On 21/06/2016 14:59, Dan Brickley wrote: > On 4 January 2016 at 11:40, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: >> What do you need, Martynas? >> >> In general, we're happy to host a vocabulary if it's created and maintained >> by a CG (there are others situations we're happy with as well but a CG is >> simplest). >> >> I'd expect to see something like a specification doc written and published >> by the CG. Looking at https://www.w3.org/community/declarative-apps and its >> mailing list I can't immediately see what the vocab is you're wanting to >> publish? > > Interesting! What can W3C offer in terms of hosting JSON-LD context > files associated with such vocabularies? There are some fiddly nuances > around HTTP headers if you want to use content negotiation in a > cacheable manner ((*)as we are learning at schema.org :) > > Dan > > (*) https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1219 > -- Phil Archer W3C Data Activity Lead http://www.w3.org/2013/data/ http://philarcher.org +44 (0)7887 767755 @philarcher1
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 14:20:49 UTC