On 4 January 2016 at 11:40, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > What do you need, Martynas? > > In general, we're happy to host a vocabulary if it's created and maintained > by a CG (there are others situations we're happy with as well but a CG is > simplest). > > I'd expect to see something like a specification doc written and published > by the CG. Looking at https://www.w3.org/community/declarative-apps and its > mailing list I can't immediately see what the vocab is you're wanting to > publish? Interesting! What can W3C offer in terms of hosting JSON-LD context files associated with such vocabularies? There are some fiddly nuances around HTTP headers if you want to use content negotiation in a cacheable manner ((*)as we are learning at schema.org :) Dan (*) https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1219Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 14:00:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:58 UTC