- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 14:59:27 +0100
- To: Phil Archer <phila@w3.org>
- Cc: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, public-declarative-apps@w3.org, Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
On 4 January 2016 at 11:40, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org> wrote: > What do you need, Martynas? > > In general, we're happy to host a vocabulary if it's created and maintained > by a CG (there are others situations we're happy with as well but a CG is > simplest). > > I'd expect to see something like a specification doc written and published > by the CG. Looking at https://www.w3.org/community/declarative-apps and its > mailing list I can't immediately see what the vocab is you're wanting to > publish? Interesting! What can W3C offer in terms of hosting JSON-LD context files associated with such vocabularies? There are some fiddly nuances around HTTP headers if you want to use content negotiation in a cacheable manner ((*)as we are learning at schema.org :) Dan (*) https://github.com/schemaorg/schemaorg/issues/1219
Received on Tuesday, 21 June 2016 14:00:12 UTC