- From: José Manuel Cantera Fonseca <jmcf@tid.es>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 16:53:10 +0200
- To: Andrea Trasatti <andrea@trasatti.it>
- Cc: public-ddwg@w3.org
Hi, Trying to summarize, what is your current proposal? To extend use case 2? Cheers Andrea Trasatti escribió: > > If that is the case, then I think that this should be extended to the > existing use-case 2 which is more of a "marketing" grouping of devices > rather than for the mobile web. > > Since the group is not going to actually define any families, but > simply defining the API's by which an "extended-DDR" can manage device > grouping, I don't see the need to say which use-cases are out of > scope. As long as the DDR supports the basic API's and the > "extended-DDR" supported the extra API's we will define, I don't see > any borders to the groupings that different individuals might create. > > I also apologies for an e-mail I sent out that was apparently > encrypted with GPG. All I wanted to provide was a link to the page of > the use cases, which I'll send now, > http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/wiki/DeviceDescriptionStructuresUseCases > > - Andrea > > > Il giorno 28/mar/07, alle ore 13:48, Rotan Hanrahan ha scritto: > >> >> While we are focussed in DDWG on the production of content for the Web, >> we have considered the potential need in other domains and we aim to be >> extensible to support other use cases. I would have no objection to >> information on the periphery of the scope of DDWG being included in the >> DDWG wiki, so long as we make it clear (i.e. on the page itself) that >> this is a topic beyond our primary focus. >> >> Such information may be of use to the wider community, and perhaps it >> may encourage them to contribute to our core activity, which is >> primarily concerned with supporting content adaptation through the >> provision of device descriptions. >> >> ---Rotan. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On >> Behalf Of Andrea Trasatti >> Sent: 28 March 2007 12:41 >> To: public-ddwg@w3.org >> Subject: DeviceDescriptionStructuresUseCases Use cases >> >> >> I was about to create a new use-case, but I think that this actually >> partially matches the already existing use-case 1. >> >> I am proposing a change in the text and creation of 2 use-cases OR >> the integration. >> The current use-case is focused on content adaptation for the mobile >> web and WAP. I was thinking of the ability to group devices according >> to other characteristics for example for game and application >> developers. Companies could be interested in grouping devices >> according to the supported JSR's or some hardware characteristics >> such as bluetooth, GPS, A-GPS, camera (did you see mobilized?) and so >> on. >> >> It is very similar to use-case one, the use of the grouping is again >> to produce a content that is suitable for a group of devices, the >> difference is that in the current test only the production of web >> pages is considered, while I'd like to extend the idea to other types >> of content such as mobile games, video, ringtones and so on. >> >> We could restrict the existing use-case to web and create one that is >> for applications and games and another one for media contents in >> general. >> >> >> Andrea Trasatti >> Blog: http://trasatti.blogspot.com/ >> W3C invited expert >> >> >> >> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 14:56:45 UTC