- From: Andrea Trasatti <andrea@trasatti.it>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 13:55:39 +0200
- To: public-ddwg@w3.org
If that is the case, then I think that this should be extended to the existing use-case 2 which is more of a "marketing" grouping of devices rather than for the mobile web. Since the group is not going to actually define any families, but simply defining the API's by which an "extended-DDR" can manage device grouping, I don't see the need to say which use-cases are out of scope. As long as the DDR supports the basic API's and the "extended-DDR" supported the extra API's we will define, I don't see any borders to the groupings that different individuals might create. I also apologies for an e-mail I sent out that was apparently encrypted with GPG. All I wanted to provide was a link to the page of the use cases, which I'll send now, http://www.w3.org/2005/MWI/DDWG/ wiki/DeviceDescriptionStructuresUseCases - Andrea Il giorno 28/mar/07, alle ore 13:48, Rotan Hanrahan ha scritto: > > While we are focussed in DDWG on the production of content for the > Web, > we have considered the potential need in other domains and we aim > to be > extensible to support other use cases. I would have no objection to > information on the periphery of the scope of DDWG being included in > the > DDWG wiki, so long as we make it clear (i.e. on the page itself) that > this is a topic beyond our primary focus. > > Such information may be of use to the wider community, and perhaps it > may encourage them to contribute to our core activity, which is > primarily concerned with supporting content adaptation through the > provision of device descriptions. > > ---Rotan. > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg- > request@w3.org] On > Behalf Of Andrea Trasatti > Sent: 28 March 2007 12:41 > To: public-ddwg@w3.org > Subject: DeviceDescriptionStructuresUseCases Use cases > > > I was about to create a new use-case, but I think that this actually > partially matches the already existing use-case 1. > > I am proposing a change in the text and creation of 2 use-cases OR > the integration. > The current use-case is focused on content adaptation for the mobile > web and WAP. I was thinking of the ability to group devices according > to other characteristics for example for game and application > developers. Companies could be interested in grouping devices > according to the supported JSR's or some hardware characteristics > such as bluetooth, GPS, A-GPS, camera (did you see mobilized?) and so > on. > > It is very similar to use-case one, the use of the grouping is again > to produce a content that is suitable for a group of devices, the > difference is that in the current test only the production of web > pages is considered, while I'd like to extend the idea to other types > of content such as mobile games, video, ringtones and so on. > > We could restrict the existing use-case to web and create one that is > for applications and games and another one for media contents in > general. > > > Andrea Trasatti > Blog: http://trasatti.blogspot.com/ > W3C invited expert > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 28 March 2007 11:55:47 UTC