- From: Andrea Trasatti <andrea@trasatti.it>
- Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 10:38:02 +0100
- To: public-ddwg@w3.org
Il giorno 18/feb/07, alle ore 21:52, Rotan Hanrahan ha scritto: > > For each idea there is a plus, and a minus. > > Obviously, if the RSS carried each updated page as full content > then everyone on the feed would get immediate visibility of the > changes. > > That would be good except for two things: > 1. We are going to be making a lot of changes and > 2. Some of our regularly changing pages are very big. > > For an example of a big page, look at the Ecosystem wiki pages, one > of which is an aggregate of all the others to represent the final > document that will be published as a W3C WG Note. If you were to > receive a full copy of this draft Note every time I (or any other > wiki author) changed a word here or there, you'd be complaining > that your inbox is overflowing. Same for any pages with big entries > (the Protégé screenshots, the impending IDL examples etc.) > > I will admit that I'm having a bit of trouble with my own RSS > client, and will be looking for a better one soon, so I haven't > seen what the wiki RSS is delivering. My expectation is that it > merely alerts me to which pages are changed, gives me a link to > that page and also tells me the comment that the author used when s/ > he changed the page. That's about all I really need to know. Right now the RSS doesn't say anything. Author's comment would be good too at least you'd know if it was a minor change such as correction of a typo or a consistent change. - Andrea
Received on Monday, 19 February 2007 09:38:19 UTC