RE: Vocabulary document

No vocabulary has been completed by the DIWG, and now the task is in the hands of the DDWG. I believe that the handover of responsibility that took place during the joint meeting between the two groups means that DDWG is free (and even encouraged) to use any material previously produced by the DIWG.

The work that was published during DDWG charter 1, the information from the DD workshop, and all other relevant material can be used as input to the work on the Vocabulary. The current charter specifically says that we must define a light-weight process to manage (add, update, remove) entries in the vocabulary, so it is unlikely that we will engage in further use-cases and requirements. There is already sufficient published information to enable a good start on this work. Any further analysis may be seen as unnecessary delay. Furthermore, we will conduct this work in public so there will be ample opportunity for contributions.

Thinking out loud is good.

Regards,
---Rotan.

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
Sent: 02 February 2007 12:06
To: Rotan Hanrahan
Cc: public-ddwg@w3.org
Subject: Re: Vocabulary document


The problem with that document is that it is a first draft and never go 
to the state of an official note ...

I'm just wondering if in our vocabulary document we have first to 
produce a set of requirements and use cases in order to create the core 
vocabulary.

In that case, I think that the CPC may provide some useful input for our 
new document. We could even copy & paste and "make obsolete" the CPC 
document ... I'm just thinking out loud ...

Best Wishes

Rotan Hanrahan escribió:
> It certainly is useful. This is the document that DI were working on so many years ago, possibly ahead of time. Today we are ready to address the issues presented in that document.
>
> DIWG held a joint meeting with DDWG last week in which the responsibility for making a vocabulary happen was handed over to DDWG. There is a participant overlap between the two groups, and we have a good record of cooperation, which is expected to continue.
>
> In the wiki we will be launching next week, we will try to provide references to all previous resources from other groups that will be of use to DDWG in its vocabulary work. The CPC document will be included on that list.
>
> Regards,
> ---Rotan. 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
> Sent: 02 February 2007 11:49
> To: public-ddwg@w3.org
> Subject: Vocabulary document
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Browsing the W3C site I have found this requirements document for "Core 
> Presentation Characteristics". I think this has to do with the previous 
> work of the DI Group ... I don't know if this could be useful for our 
> vocabulary document ...
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> [[
>
> Sorry with the link :-)
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/cpc-req/
>
> ]]
>
>
>

Received on Saturday, 3 February 2007 03:01:19 UTC