Re: Vocabulary document

The problem with that document is that it is a first draft and never go 
to the state of an official note ...

I'm just wondering if in our vocabulary document we have first to 
produce a set of requirements and use cases in order to create the core 
vocabulary.

In that case, I think that the CPC may provide some useful input for our 
new document. We could even copy & paste and "make obsolete" the CPC 
document ... I'm just thinking out loud ...

Best Wishes

Rotan Hanrahan escribió:
> It certainly is useful. This is the document that DI were working on so many years ago, possibly ahead of time. Today we are ready to address the issues presented in that document.
>
> DIWG held a joint meeting with DDWG last week in which the responsibility for making a vocabulary happen was handed over to DDWG. There is a participant overlap between the two groups, and we have a good record of cooperation, which is expected to continue.
>
> In the wiki we will be launching next week, we will try to provide references to all previous resources from other groups that will be of use to DDWG in its vocabulary work. The CPC document will be included on that list.
>
> Regards,
> ---Rotan. 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ddwg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ddwg-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
> Sent: 02 February 2007 11:49
> To: public-ddwg@w3.org
> Subject: Vocabulary document
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Browsing the W3C site I have found this requirements document for "Core 
> Presentation Characteristics". I think this has to do with the previous 
> work of the DI Group ... I don't know if this could be useful for our 
> vocabulary document ...
>
> Best Regards
>
>
> [[
>
> Sorry with the link :-)
>
> http://www.w3.org/TR/cpc-req/
>
> ]]
>
>
>

Received on Friday, 2 February 2007 12:07:46 UTC