- From: JOSE MANUEL CANTERA FONSECA <jmcf@tid.es>
- Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 23:19:17 +0200
- To: Andrea Trasatti <atrasatti@mtld.mobi>
- Cc: public-ddr-vocab@w3.org, public-ddwg@w3.org
- Message-id: <fa4e6a981692.1692fa4e6a98@tid.es>
Hi,
As a follow-up of my proposal on "subproperties", and taking into
account that the MIME type is bound to a media, What about something like
ddr.getProperty("supportedImageFormats").get("gif").getProperty("MIMEType")
Best Regards
----
José Manuel Cantera Fonseca
Telefónica I+D
----- Mensaje original -----
De: Andrea Trasatti <atrasatti@mtld.mobi>
Fecha: Lunes, Octubre 1, 2007 5:58 pm
Asunto: [VOC] MIME Types
Para: public-ddr-vocab@w3.org
CC: public-ddwg@w3.org
>
> While working on the Core Vocabulary and trying to represent the
> new
> proposed structure of properties as sets of values I wondered about
>
> MIME Types.
> There are some markups or image formats that share the same MIME
> Type, think of application/xml (all XHTML) or image/gif (any type
> of
> GIF image), but there are some contents that might have more than
> one
> MIME Type, think of XHTML that can be associated with
> application/xml
> and also text/html or JPEG images that are often served as
> image/jpg
> and image/jpeg and the same with MPEG and MP3 files.
>
> How should we represent these? Should these be strings (so list
> only
> the preferred one in case of multiple) or should they be sets of
> values or ordered lists? An ordered list would allow us to have
> multiple values and at the same time define which is the preferred
> MIME Type to use.
> jpegMimeType would then be 'image/jpg, image/jpeg' where the first
> is
> the preferred one.
>
> This seems to me the best approach but would fall down into
> requiring
> a property for every type thus canceling the advantage of using
> something like "imageFormat" as a property to list all supported
> image formats.
>
> I think we need some feedback from those individuals and companies
> that already worked with these data structures for their vocabularies.
>
> - Andrea
>
>
Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 21:19:39 UTC