Re: Implementation Reports

This document has basically been unmaintained for a year or so, and was 
using terminology from ShEx. I am updating this particular term in the 
next commit. Should be shapesGraph and dataGraph.

Holger


On 2/03/2017 3:27, Irene Polikoff wrote:
> With regards to SHACL Test Suite 
> http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/data-shapes-test-suite/ referenced on 
> the wiki page:
>
> It has the following:
>
>
>         4. Validate RDF data with a Schema
>
>     These tests check that if an RDF graph validates against a Schema
>
> What is meant here by the “schema”? Is it intended to say:
>
>
>         4. Validate RDF data against a Shapes Graph
>
>     These tests check that if an RDF graph validates against a Shapes
>     graph
>
> And, if so, wouldn’t it be better for sht:schema to be sht:shapes?
>
>
>
>
>> On Mar 1, 2017, at 7:19 AM, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com 
>> <mailto:holger@topquadrant.com>> wrote:
>>
>> One of the TODO items before CR is to produce a suggested format for 
>> implementation reports.
>>
>> I have started a wiki page for this
>>
>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Implementations
>>
>> As usual, comments and help more than welcome.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Holger
>>
>>
>