Re: charter nominally extended + old drafts

Hi!
I'll give the UCR a final read tmrw and report back as soon as I'm finished.
br simon
-------- Original message --------From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> Date: 6/12/17  20:38  (GMT+01:00) To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org Subject: charter nominally extended + old drafts 
For people who didn't see the AC announcement last week when SHACL was 
published, the WG was also extended by two months, so it can help 
address any issues that might arise during the AC review of SHACL.    I 
don't expect we'll need to meet, and we should not take up any new work.

I just noticed, though, that there are two old Working Drafts:

https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/
and
https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-abstract-syntax/

These should be republished as WG NOTEs.   If there's no useful 
consensus text in them, as I can imagine might be the case with absyn, 
the NOTE can just be a status section explaining why the draft was 
abandoned.

Thoughts on these?   Any last minute cleanup to UCR?   What should we do 
about AbSyn?

       -- Sandro