- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 14:38:11 -0400
- To: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
For people who didn't see the AC announcement last week when SHACL was
published, the WG was also extended by two months, so it can help
address any issues that might arise during the AC review of SHACL. I
don't expect we'll need to meet, and we should not take up any new work.
I just noticed, though, that there are two old Working Drafts:
https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-ucr/
and
https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl-abstract-syntax/
These should be republished as WG NOTEs. If there's no useful
consensus text in them, as I can imagine might be the case with absyn,
the NOTE can just be a status section explaining why the draft was
abandoned.
Thoughts on these? Any last minute cleanup to UCR? What should we do
about AbSyn?
-- Sandro
Received on Monday, 12 June 2017 18:38:17 UTC