- From: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
- Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 12:56:43 +1000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
I think sh:shapesGraph would be an option here:
https://www.w3.org/TR/shacl/#sh-shapes-graph
However, given that the shacl namespace may be imported into a wide
variety of use cases and thus the potential wide implications of adding
such a triple are unpredictable right now, what about just rdfs:seeAlso?
Holger
On 10/04/2017 12:21, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> TimBL asked us to put a machine readable link from the SHACL namespace
> document (https://www.w3.org/ns/shacl) to the SHACL document which can
> be used to validate documents written using that namespace
> (https://www.w3.org/ns/shacl-shacl). This seems like the kind of
> link that would be generally useful, even if only as a rough default.
> Obviously in many cases, one namespace would be appropriately used in
> lots of different shapes. But in some cases (eg SHACL) where there's
> a sensible default, it'd be nice for the machines to be able to find
> it. So, has anyone made such a predicate? If not, is there a
> reason not to make it up now, as a non-rec-track extension?
>
> -- Sandro
>
>
Received on Monday, 10 April 2017 02:57:22 UTC