W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > October 2016

Re: ISSUE-158: Request to review change

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 08:55:24 -0700
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <24cb8163-229e-175d-9f5d-0a59ce811ae9@kcoyle.net>
I think this is ok - "ill-typed literal" is also used in other standards 
(search "ill-typed literal site:w3.org").

This checks the ^^xsd:X literals. sh:nodeKind checks for IRI, bnode, or 
literal. There's one more type in RDF 1.1 [1] which is the 
"language-tagged string". We have sh:uniqueLang and sh:languageIn, but 
is there also a need to check that a literal is language-tagged?


On 10/30/16 10:06 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> I have made an edit to implement the resolution to ISSUE-158:
> https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/77fd283597db8a5897a1d6ee2d53a50024a7c6d7
> Could the WG please review that these changes are correct and specific
> enough? The RDF spec uses the term "ill-typed literal". I don't know how
> to define "the datatypes supported by SPARQL 1.1", and suspect we will
> get questions on this.
> Thanks,
> Holger

Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Monday, 31 October 2016 15:56:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:37 UTC