ISSUE-158: Request to review change

I have made an edit to implement the resolution to ISSUE-158:

Could the WG please review that these changes are correct and specific 
enough? The RDF spec uses the term "ill-typed literal". I don't know how 
to define "the datatypes supported by SPARQL 1.1", and suspect we will 
get questions on this.


Received on Monday, 31 October 2016 05:07:31 UTC