W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > October 2016

Re: shapes-ACTION-43: Take a read through the spec and raise specific terminology issues as needed

From: markh <markh@metarelate.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 18:19:49 +0000
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Cc: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20161017181949.6d099b86@eddy>
Regarding:
"The spec uses different terminology from SPARQL where it is using
concepts from SPARQL. For example, the SHACL spec uses "row" where
SPARQL uses "solution", and "value" where SPARQL uses "binding"."

I have found numerous references to SPARQL queries which discuss
'value', in a way not related to SPARQL 'binding's (unsurprisingly)

I have found a number of references to row, where it  may be better
to use 'solution'

I have staged a PR:
https://github.com/marqh/data-shapes/pull/2

illustrating updates to terminology and the text, to reflect my
thoughts.

If this is of value and editorial, I can create a PR. If we need an
'issue', and further discussion, then I can raise one.

please advise?
thank you
mark





On Tue, 27 Sep 2016 13:57:13 +0000
RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
wrote:

> shapes-ACTION-43: Take a read through the spec and raise specific
> terminology issues as needed
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/actions/43
> 
> Assigned to: Mark Hedley
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 17 October 2016 18:20:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:37 UTC