W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents

From: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 11:05:19 +0200
Message-ID: <CA+u4+a1dP0yG4nXN76x3SisXOTPxAynxxiYze_2QQHALR7FigA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Cc: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>, public-data-shapes-wg <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Hi Peter, I did some research on other w3c specs regarding the term

if we changed occurrences of instance from e.g.
"shapes are the instances of sh:Shape" to
"sh:Shape is the class of all shapes"
would this be fine from your side?

Some cases like sh:class and sh:classScope would need extra care of course.

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:24 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> Even in this situation I think that "instance" in the rest of the document
> needs to be qualified.  Some readers of the document will know about RDFS
> instance and will need to be continually reminded that the meaning that
> they
> know for "instance" is not being used in this document.
> peter

Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http://
Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
Received on Monday, 21 March 2016 09:06:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:30 UTC