shapes-ISSUE-139 (Universal applicability): Can all constraint properties be applied in all scenarios? [SHACL - Core] from RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker on 2016-03-18 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2016)

From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 03:13:06 +0000
To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1agkqY-000Fhu-55@deneb.w3.org>

shapes-ISSUE-139 (Universal applicability): Can all constraint properties be applied in all scenarios? [SHACL - Core]

http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/139

Raised by: Holger Knublauch
On product: SHACL - Core

Proposal 4 claims that all property constraints (such as sh:minCount, sh:class, sh:minInclusive) can be applied in all contexts, i.e. with sh:constraint, sh:property and sh:inverseProperty (or even with arbitrary paths).

I believe this makes no sense, e.g. sh:minCount does not make sense at Shape-level (only for sh:property/sh:inverseProperty), and sh:minInclusive does not make sense for sh:inverseProperty.

Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 03:13:07 UTC