- From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 02:57:29 +0000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
shapes-ISSUE-138 (Property constraints as lists): Should property constraints use rdf:Lists? [SHACL - Core]
http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/138
Raised by: Holger Knublauch
On product: SHACL - Core
Proposal 4 proposes a change to the RDF representation of property constraints, from
ex:MyShape a sh:Shape ;
sh:property [
sh:predicate rdfs:label ;
sh:minCount 1 ;
] .
to
ex:MyShape a sh:Shape ;
sh:propValues (
rdfs:label
[ sh:minCount 1 ]
) .
Inverse properties currently look like
ex:MyShape a sh:Shape ;
sh:inverseProperty [
sh:predicate ex:myProperty ;
sh:minCount 1 ;
] .
and would change to
ex:MyShape a sh:Shape ;
sh:propValues (
[ sh:inverse ex:myProperty ] ;
[ sh:minCount 1 ] ;
) .
Received on Friday, 18 March 2016 02:57:30 UTC