Peter, can you check if this commit overcomes the ordering issue? https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/commit/9edef4c82a7f6480d0c45e3e34656c7f93f1dfa5 Would you prefer to delete the figure completely? It that case I would delete that last two lines of the commit too On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider < pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote: > On 03/06/2016 08:46 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > [...] > > > On 7/03/2016 6:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: > > [...] > > .2 Filters > > >> A SHACL processor might not begin by validating filters. It might > instead > >> look at all in-scope nodes and only later remove those that don't pass > the > >> filters. The document makes this illegal but it might be useful if the > >> filter shape is expensive to compute and few violations are expected. > > > > I believe this is already covered by stating that SHACL engines can > produce > > additional validation results, see discussion above. > > This is not about validation results. It is about order of execution. The > document states: > > When a SHACL processor validates a focus node against a shape, it begins by > validating any filters associated with the shape via sh:filterShape. > > This is too procedural. > > peter > > > -- Dimitris Kontokostas Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://rdfunit.aksw.org, http:// http://aligned-project.eu Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas Research Group: AKSW/KILT http://aksw.org/Groups/KILT
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2016 17:37:08 UTC