W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents

From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 11:27:22 -0800
To: "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <56E31C1A.8040305@kcoyle.net>

On 3/11/16 11:18 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> However, these definitions of subclass, superclass, type, and instance differ
> significantly from their meanings in RDFS.

Then, Houston, we've got a problem. If the definitions differ, then the 
sign represents a different thing. Although that works in natural 
language, in technical standards we should have one sign = one meaning, 
or we will be awash in ambiguity.


Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 19:27:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:30 UTC