Re: type and instance and subclass in SHACL documents

On 3/11/16 11:18 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:
> However, these definitions of subclass, superclass, type, and instance differ
> significantly from their meanings in RDFS.

Then, Houston, we've got a problem. If the definitions differ, then the 
sign represents a different thing. Although that works in natural 
language, in technical standards we should have one sign = one meaning, 
or we will be awash in ambiguity.


Karen Coyle
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600

Received on Friday, 11 March 2016 19:27:37 UTC