- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:42:14 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 03/06/2016 08:46 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: [...] > On 7/03/2016 6:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] >> 4. Declaring the Shapes Graph >> >> RDF graphs don't have to be part of a dataset. What happens then? > > We simply assume a dataset, the rest is an implementation detail. A dataset > may include virtual graphs that are created on the fly, or graphs that are > dynamically loaded from their URL, or whatever. But in the data interface, > each graph has a name (IRI). SHACL assumes that the data graph is part of an RDF dataset? This is news to me. peter
Received on Monday, 7 March 2016 16:42:48 UTC