W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2016

Re: comments on SHACL 3 March editors draft

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:42:14 -0800
To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <56DDAF66.5050208@gmail.com>
On 03/06/2016 08:46 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
[...]
> On 7/03/2016 6:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:

[...]

>> 4. Declaring the Shapes Graph
>>
>> RDF graphs don't have to be part of a dataset.  What happens then?
> 
> We simply assume a dataset, the rest is an implementation detail. A dataset
> may include virtual graphs that are created on the fly, or graphs that are
> dynamically loaded from their URL, or whatever. But in the data interface,
> each graph has a name (IRI).

SHACL assumes that the data graph is part of an RDF dataset?

This is news to me.

peter
Received on Monday, 7 March 2016 16:42:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:30 UTC