Re: comments on SHACL 3 March editors draft

On 03/06/2016 08:46 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote:
> On 7/03/2016 6:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote:


>> 4. Declaring the Shapes Graph
>> RDF graphs don't have to be part of a dataset.  What happens then?
> We simply assume a dataset, the rest is an implementation detail. A dataset
> may include virtual graphs that are created on the fly, or graphs that are
> dynamically loaded from their URL, or whatever. But in the data interface,
> each graph has a name (IRI).

SHACL assumes that the data graph is part of an RDF dataset?

This is news to me.


Received on Monday, 7 March 2016 16:42:48 UTC