- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 08:22:19 -0800
- To: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 03/06/2016 08:46 PM, Holger Knublauch wrote: [...] > On 7/03/2016 6:59, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] >> The output of the validation process may be just a YES/NO. > > This is not my understanding. I thought SHACL compliant engines must return > the validation results as defined for each constraint type. Otherwise, they > would only implement a part of the SHACL core, and compromise > interchangeability of databases. My understanding is that fully compliant > engines MAY return more results, but MUST at least return the results as > specified. So it is forbidden to have a SHACL compliant engine that has an interface that produces a YES/NO answer from validation, even if that engine also has an interface that produces (all the) validation results? peter
Received on Monday, 7 March 2016 16:22:56 UTC