- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 08:41:22 -0700
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 3/29/15 12:27 AM, Holger Knublauch wrote: > On the general naming of all these facet properties, I'd suggest we > either include "value" into all of them, or drop it from all. From this > perspective, it could be either > > sh:valueDatatype, sh:valueType, sh:valueShape, sh:valueKind, > sh:allowedValues > > or > > sh:datatype, sh:type, sh:shape, sh:kind, sh:enum (?) > > Since these will be repeated and hand-coded over and over again, I'd > have a slight preference to the short names, as long as we are confident > that people will understand their meaning. I believe they are all quite > clear, although sh:type may be confused with rdf:type. Must we assume that properties will be hand coded? Could the property name be sh:vD and the label be "valueDatatype"? I really hate the idea of making decisions based on "hand coding," and also think that we should be putting more energy into labels and definitions. I really would advise against sh:type for exactly the reason you give. kc > > Holger > > > On 3/28/15 3:02 AM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote: >> >> sh:literalType instead of sh:datatype - since it is about literal >> values >> >> >> For me, both are ok. >> >> I would also like to suggest a way to constraint the language tag. For >> example, I would like to express concepts that have rdfs:label. >> ex:shape a sh:Shape >> sh:property [ >> sh:predicate rdfs:label ; >> sh:valueDatatype xsd:string ; >> sh:languageTag "es" >> ] . >> >> I have no preference for some specific name of that property, but I >> think there should be some way to constraint the language tag of a >> string literal. >> >> Best regards, Jose Labra >> >> >> On 3/27/15, 7:30 AM, "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de >> <mailto:richard@cyganiak.de>> wrote: >> >> >Or maybe even: >> > >> > sh:type - for constraining the value¹s rdf:type >> > sh:datatype - for constraining the value¹s literal datatype >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> -- Jose Labra >> > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Sunday, 29 March 2015 15:41:54 UTC