Re: shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same graph? [SHACL Spec]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I am uncertain as to what access to the shape graph when validating the data
graph is supposed to mean.

On one hand, it seems to me that if the shape graph is inaccessible then
there is no way that the shapes can be acccessed and so no way to validate
the shapes, so it appears to me that all proposals need this.  On the other
hand, I am unaware that any proposal needs the shape graph to be part of the
data graph.

peter


On 03/28/2015 01:21 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-30 (shape-and-data-graphs): Are shapes and data in the same
> graph? [SHACL Spec]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/30
> 
> Raised by: Richard Cyganiak On product: SHACL Spec
> 
> Some proposals assume that the data to be validated, and the RDF graph
> encoding the shapes, are in separate graphs. Others assume they are in
> the same graph, and rely on being able to access triples from the shape
> graph when validating the data graph.
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVFw+vAAoJECjN6+QThfjzx4kH/i/4q/Fx4K2quQhw4vjd6GlA
paQTYg8wzvkFwQE1L8QaBxUpgveqJsC8+lSpd+Dt1T/GrWd36FAmxBK1bpdy6dz9
kG03NAXT2L9Bzxmiqrq1r1QX0plxsenr9g1k/w4G9wCArS4EGkEnWmGrmX1F2A15
9bDD1NIQ16F9J3bekXFOy0GJcg+zbbES+bXaExhyCmh1CRjTERtieqIHC68WNPh5
0w/4on+r7Mk+KEALl68KQZIa2qu0/vvGzJUBpan6iaCWPTLZTNd1OCQwU1pQ4u8M
eeqSjTwYHocNah1I8gMXKahj8ohkHAgpcbehA2/XBg1bFR8yCtYzSDkTxMM6ywg=
=Ou6j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 20:32:17 UTC