Re: shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes? [SHACL Spec] from Peter F. Patel-Schneider on 2015-03-28 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 13:25:46 -0700
To: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <55170E4A.4020203@gmail.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I believe that the best way to achieve this is to allow conjuncts and
disjuncts to be shapes.

peter


On 03/28/2015 01:15 PM, RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> shapes-ISSUE-24 (specialisation): Can shapes specialise other shapes?
> [SHACL Spec]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/24
> 
> Raised by: Richard Cyganiak On product: SHACL Spec
> 
> How to define a shape that is based on another shape, in other words, to
> satisfy the new shape one must satisfy the old shape plus additional
> constraints?
> 
> This interacts with ISSUE-1 (inference) and ISSUE-23 (punning).
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVFw5KAAoJECjN6+QThfjzkm0H/joSUi4XnIHlwniGqKoO8z1h
zr6x4LYiOaaT2fiI1r8ORikhbK4+CtyXt5ByQqFO0UcSbw4IAtDVyA6iZR99bmfe
rV7jnK+R7CFufqCC4RU7+7c14nymhth2We2vfL6KczdIMVPBzl1J/yA5KBy2EeKu
NMOrqfC8L2qW8EUmTpJBounds40QC3oTSzBwJ01Ek8SOW1gqbo3cxtcXTd3bCw3o
12PEdRaGjI4NTBC5HzxbMeziEnSGXXNUyU/JCPdIYxXz9kZB+PQmAHykmjm5AVRT
ccnkO/Ozm9Upxi60w5DLZ3mAzZaoQAXKb7d5yv6V3bxz4o5BlqyABxt7g5mIXp8=
=/eYE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Received on Saturday, 28 March 2015 20:26:15 UTC