Re: Value type constraints from Irene Polikoff on 2015-03-27 (public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org from March 2015)

From: Irene Polikoff <irene@topquadrant.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2015 11:23:45 -0400
To: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>, Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>
CC: "public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org" <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D13AEDD5.284A0%irene@topquadrant.com>

One could even do

sh:literalType instead of sh:datatype - since it is about literal values

On 3/27/15, 7:30 AM, "Richard Cyganiak" <richard@cyganiak.de> wrote:

>Or maybe even:
>
>    sh:type - for constraining the value¹s rdf:type
>    sh:datatype - for constraining the value¹s literal datatype

Received on Friday, 27 March 2015 15:32:37 UTC