W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL

From: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:00:59 -0400
Message-ID: <CAApBiOnWEVGoUcHTOoLZ50gzmZ862DT6LwtK7DaaXk4aTAN-WA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>, RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
I voted for option b so we can deliver the high-level part sooner and
get feedback. I expect that feedback will also come from the
requirements of the extension mechanism, and also later from
implementation experience.

-- Arthur

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo
<jelabra@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was going to vote but reading the options, they are both options
> reasonable, what worries me is if there is some hidden implication about the
> relationship between SHACL and SPARQL.
>
> If option a) doesn't imply that the high-level language constructs will be
> merged with the SPARQL definitions, I would not have a problem if they are
> in the same document but in separate sections.
>
> However, if voting option (a) implies that the high-level language will be
> tied to SPARQL as it currently is, the my vote will be against.
>
> Best regards, Jose Labra
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> There has been a lot (!) of discussion on the mailing list and I'd like to
>> get an update on where the WG stands with regard to the different approaches
>> being proposed. I know this doesn't capture all the issues (obviously) and
>> some will feel that this isn't the right question but at least this is one
>> point of contention that we need to address so, please, bear with me.
>>
>> Rather than doing this just on a teleconference I set up a wiki page so
>> that who can't attend the teleconference can still respond:
>> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Strawpoll_On_Approach
>>
>> Thank you.
>> --
>> Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web Technologies -
>> IBM Software Group
>
>
>
>
> --
> -- Jose Labra
>
Received on Thursday, 26 March 2015 18:01:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC