W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: STRAWPOLL on Approach for SHACL

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2015 13:42:09 -0700
Message-ID: <5519B521.1070507@gmail.com>
To: Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com>
CC: RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jose:

Are you against using SPARQL as a specification formalism for the high-level
language of SHACL even if there is no need to use a SPARQL implementation
(or equivalent) to actually implement the high-level language of SHACL?

If so, what aspects or features of such a specification are you against?

peter


On 03/26/2015 10:52 AM, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo wrote:
> I was going to vote but reading the options, they are both options 
> reasonable, what worries me is if there is some hidden implication about 
> the relationship between SHACL and SPARQL.
> 
> If option a) doesn't imply that the high-level language constructs will 
> be merged with the SPARQL definitions, I would not have a problem if
> they are in the same document but in separate sections.
> 
> However, if voting option (a) implies that the high-level language will 
> be tied to SPARQL as it currently is, the my vote will be against.
> 
> Best regards, Jose Labra
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@us.ibm.com 
> <mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com>> wrote:
> 
> There has been a lot (!) of discussion on the mailing list and I'd like 
> to get an update on where the WG stands with regard to the different 
> approaches being proposed. I know this doesn't capture all the issues 
> (obviously) and some will feel that this isn't the right question but at
>  least this is one point of contention that we need to address so, 
> please, bear with me.
> 
> Rather than doing this just on a teleconference I set up a wiki page so 
> that who can't attend the teleconference can still respond: 
> https://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/wiki/Strawpoll_On_Approach
> 
> Thank you. -- Arnaud  Le Hors - Senior Technical Staff Member, Open Web 
> Technologies - IBM Software Group
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- -- Jose Labra
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVGbUhAAoJECjN6+QThfjz4YcIAKPfBa9XucZ1sRmxghaHqlq1
1M0umxM79QXRBjNL3qO1R2QZRGo3tgrrZf0cKTBJOXFSRaEyX5g7nZuy3gGkFHNz
jrjN393t9wNZ4ZVJLPTN+zsETECeSlwho6k2qGheX1DS/biwfeUg9ZSJx2d/Av+v
faT8yQN7dR4I3GDiSl4uL3VZfdkqqzq56mGlzTocPDfiLNMThBaJX6dn/WuWnzMF
XjPITr42kwFeow4Cq0DQ4OgqvoahRA0EtVmI+IoBEVcj/yJgxSzn9qc6UvwV7HPd
EQEe1dHN9eUwUlHdQWynn8PlO942qroeP4Nqa120Vo3Egowr8A94RcK0q3+l7Ig=
=pLs4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Monday, 30 March 2015 20:42:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC