W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org > March 2015

Re: Pragmatic Proposal for the Structure of the SHACL Spec

From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 20:13:00 -0700
Message-ID: <550A3EBC.6090902@gmail.com>
To: Arthur Ryman <arthur.ryman@gmail.com>, Data Shapes WG <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



On 03/18/2015 03:29 PM, Arthur Ryman wrote:
> At present we are witnessing a burst of creative activity. It is great to
> see such energy in a WG. However, the result is that we have too many
> specs and I doubt that most members can give all these documents adequate
> review. We need to focus our resources on fewer specs.

I don't see this as the case at all.

There is still not agreement on some of the fundamental aspects of SHACL.
The different "specs" are proposing different ways to go.  Without these
different approaches SHACL might end up going in a sub-optimal direction, or
even a direction that ends up being a dead end.

I would like to see even more worked-out proposals.

peter

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVCj68AAoJECjN6+QThfjzmwIH/3tvrrCmHw0kObmOnikm9TjN
zf1cgrbxp3kDx08uHQDDE/X8DjCtpcLCHcxfND5yoZS9zqRKb4L15hLc9USl4NXi
f+LKpD1xvwqre0R84UH8k53M74frBiIRllPty198rNWfdC5GFct45LSxZUCVUAre
qpreZsOgXXz6ZJhFbjbYa4WVIy+0DtOxpmdRCeiUjMouXA5eQ/GB5/OnG7IOmBH2
7KQNNLx1TPYcf3sjn7Qemq2UqrNGffRD884dWa3lTBWIokJqtm8Ibw08b2Pav4e7
/HBYSr1PMxPmcbH8lY/e/b4LZ391vWrh6KomSNxWtnx552GCEyF5SPnILsKkIhY=
=BaVo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2015 03:13:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:30:18 UTC