- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:46:32 -0800
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
On 3/3/15 8:01 AM, Irene Polikoff wrote: > As far as the higher level language requirement, I agree with the > previous email (I think it was either from Dean or from Peter) that > there is a lack of consensus on what the requirement means and, > subsequently, what would satisfy it. > > Quite a number of people believe that this requirement is addressed > thoroughly by having a well thought out library of “core macros” with > clear semantics. Should we make this an issue so that we can clear it up? - what does "higher" mean? higher than what? - is the assumption that the higher level language is THE language of the standard, or A language of the standard? - Could a suite of macros satisfy this requirement? - Could a set of core rules satisfy this requirement? -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet/+1-510-984-3600
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 17:47:04 UTC