- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 07:17:48 -0800
- To: Dimitris Kontokostas <kontokostas@informatik.uni-leipzig.de>, Jose Emilio Labra Gayo <jelabra@gmail.com>
- CC: Holger Knublauch <holger@topquadrant.com>, RDF Data Shapes Working Group <public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I do not believe that having a formalization of part of SHACL independent of the formalization of the entire language is a good idea. peter On 03/03/2015 01:00 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas wrote: [...] > > Hi Jose, all [...] > I believe everyone agrees that we will additionally define a core > language or a limited shacl profile that will be formalized independent > of SPARQL. [...] > Best, Dimitris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU9dCcAAoJECjN6+QThfjzE9QH/3Sul0D+30CQwIiJ6alTlxBp qNXvzxbZ77V0KFQFsPjO4fQLuPMMHJHMpmE6ykPECNgOTqBNvEvdg/gzB8apssgH u0v6SVpTW7Uul/L/sxrM1vJOWA9+OTgo9tQV8vFImkA12lTwCI3fYcDEuB7x6uCT e77SIuCG5CC55HKDMUVXlkjW3oSEx9jDqPK6EQCr0zBppXyNTBQPo1GsDTe3Jy6S q3VHvr/jKt3CW2TXO8WF+vCSqupBv74Xq/fpxtTLVjOitlKwCo6p+rTCYCFphrq3 6ULA7a90Q94NRgWh0ye7lPGTh1JxLKMCuDgee8Bj8H99d9GBcOiO4NydKb190js= =82dH -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 15:18:19 UTC