- From: RDF Data Shapes Working Group Issue Tracker <sysbot+tracker@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 06:04:33 +0000
- To: public-data-shapes-wg@w3.org
shapes-ISSUE-72 (QCRs): Qualified Cardinality Restrictions [SHACL Spec] http://www.w3.org/2014/data-shapes/track/issues/72 Raised by: Holger Knublauch On product: SHACL Spec One of the outcomes of the historic compromise between the ShEx and SPARQL groups was to make sure that the core vocabulary includes enough features to cover the ShEx use cases and the Compact Syntax. QCRs were mentioned, but I see no formally approved requirement on this yet. So here we go: 1) Shall SHACL support something similar to QCRs? 2) If yes, is the approach outlined below OK? http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl-ref/#sh-abstractqualifiedvalueshapepropertyconstraint-abstract-template Example: https://github.com/w3c/data-shapes/blob/ISSUE-62/data-shapes-test-suite/tests/features/core/qualifiedValueShape-001.ttl
Received on Thursday, 25 June 2015 06:04:35 UTC