Re: a path towards implementing the way forward

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
<> wrote:
> Hash: SHA256
> Which limited forms of recursion do you mean?
> Where are these limited forms useful (and better than other approaches)?


I mean that there is no need to require that sh:valueShape is acyclic.
This is form of recursion is useful (based on OSLC use cases) and has
a well-founded semantics which I spelled out recently. However, this
means that you cannot translate the shape into a single SPARQL query,
but that is not a requirement.

-- Arthur

Received on Thursday, 11 June 2015 18:02:04 UTC