Re: resolving ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how?

There was a lot of discussion on the related closed issue and I don't think
that the new formulation changes the core of the question.
So I would still say access to access between the constraints and the data
graph should not be required.
If for some people this is helpful we could define a "flag" in the
SPARQL-based constraints / templates that they need access to the
constraints graph and we can define ways access can be achieved.
In cases where access is not supported by a validation setup the engine
would raise an error.

Best,
Dimitris

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:24 PM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider <
pfpschneider@gmail.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> ISSUE-47: Can SPARQL-based constraints access the shape graph, and how? is
> still open, but in many place http://w3c.github.io/data-shapes/shacl/
> depends on being able to access the shapes graph during constraint
> validation.
>
> I think that this issue needs attention soon, as the resultant changes may
> be quite extensive.
>
>
> peter
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVeJzwAAoJECjN6+QThfjzawIIAMNRT+d9InJK8NV5pbxR2Ndw
> 1pvmeMinKE6nUCvphVVh+P5PMlwu3kKIrslH/qkNYy6EKMLXn6lApnD/7jmK8qTC
> JONCv2HEqvPHfC8mVWrCsWaaxJCqyfxHPWDNK/hkMRHt9Ck3OFMIxPTIZrAzvfTj
> rPcmUD5WUVfjD+O/xmCeBpTwMLehqR5q9ORztDsaMEBibEVhHrq6XcGbcRElGjI6
> 0s2M1yu0SCGoeg9tLjD0mGhCPDTxh0cEqot96/snJosmJwUboSUX/lIEZNl2zt/9
> VYVQomV2o/YYpx7sbJfzTUX72cCn2WmuUxfKDSXFSD9t4sIIUnCWA5svd+CtRsk=
> =N1wh
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>


-- 
Dimitris Kontokostas
Department of Computer Science, University of Leipzig & DBpedia Association
Projects: http://dbpedia.org, http://http://aligned-project.eu,
http://rdfunit.aksw.org
Homepage:http://aksw.org/DimitrisKontokostas
Research Group: http://aksw.org